Under the right circumstances, yes. DoD policy does not grant reentry code changes simply because a veteran wishes to return to service. What it does allow — when properly documented — is a correction when the code was incorrectly assigned or when the separation that generated it was improper or unjust.
Upon leaving military service, every service member receives a Reentry Eligibility (RE) code on their DD Form 214. This code communicates to future military recruiters and federal employers whether that individual is eligible to return to service. Across every branch, RE-4 carries a single, consistent meaning: the holder is barred from reenlistment due to a disqualification that cannot be waived. The most common reasons an RE-4 is assigned include misconduct, an active bar to reenlistment, and certain criminal convictions.
Each branch administers RE codes through its own governing regulation:
Regardless of branch, the governing principle is the same: the RE code reflects the reason for separation — not how that service was characterized.
No. This is the mistake veterans most often make — and it costs them time.
The RE code is tied to the reason for separation, not to how that service was characterized. A veteran can hold an Honorable discharge and still carry an RE-4. These are separate elements of the separation record, and changing one does not move the other. Securing a character upgrade through a Discharge Review Board leaves the RE code completely untouched.
This principle applies uniformly across every branch. The Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA) states plainly on its official site that the RE code is not upgraded to allow enlistment. AR 601-210 authorizes a change only when an incorrect code was entered at the time of separation. BUPERSINST 1900.8F, DAFI 36-2606, and the Coast Guard separation manuals operate the same way: an RE code records the reason for separation, and wanting to reenlist does not alter that reason.
A path to change exists on exactly two grounds:
Error — The wrong code was assigned at separation. The separation document does not accurately reflect the actual reason the service member left.
Injustice — The underlying separation was itself improper or inequitable, which renders the RE code that flowed from it equally defective.
Both grounds require documented proof submitted to the appropriate review authority. Review boards begin from the presumption that the military record is accurate. The full burden of overcoming that presumption rests with the applicant.
Each branch operates its own Discharge Review Board under DoD Directive 1332.41. Veterans who separated within the past 15 years file DD Form 293 — Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States — to the applicable service board.
The DRB evaluates whether the discharge was:
When the DRB changes the reason for separation, the RE code may change along with it.
Under 10 U.S.C. § 1552, each branch maintains a Board for Correction of Military Records as the highest administrative review authority:
Veterans who have passed the 15-year DRB window — or who have already exhausted DRB review — apply to the BCMR using DD Form 149. The BCMR has no strict time limit when relief is sought in the interest of justice.
Boards do not grant relief because a veteran has turned their life around or wants a second opportunity. They grant relief when the record itself was wrong. Persuasive petitions are built on evidence, not on narrative. Submissions that have moved boards include:
When a veteran successfully demonstrates that the original separation was flawed, boards have corrected RE-4 designations to RE-1 — fully restoring reenlistment eligibility.
An RE-4 is not simply a barrier to reenlistment. Its reach extends into other areas of a veteran’s life and career:
Veterans carrying an RE-4 should consult an experienced military records attorney early in the process. The filing procedure is formal, the evidentiary burden is genuine, and boards routinely deny incomplete or unsupported petitions.
Yes — but only on specific grounds. A review board will correct it when documented evidence shows the code was entered in error, or when the underlying separation was improper or unjust. A desire to reenlist alone is not a basis for relief.
No. The character of discharge and the RE code are distinct elements of the separation record. Upgrading one does not automatically affect the other. A veteran who obtains an Honorable characterization through a Discharge Review Board still carries the same RE-4 unless the reentry code is separately addressed.
DD Form 293 applies to separations within the past 15 years and is filed with the applicable Discharge Review Board. DD Form 149 applies to separations beyond that window, or to veterans who have already gone through the DRB without success, and is filed with the Board for Correction of Military Records.
The Discharge Review Board operates within a 15-year window from the date of separation. The Board for Correction of Military Records has no strict time limit when the applicant seeks relief in the interest of justice.
There is no legal requirement to have one. However, review boards expect a well-documented record and coherent legal framing. An attorney with experience before these boards can identify the right evidence, frame the argument effectively, and substantially improve the odds of a favorable outcome.
If an RE-4 is standing between you and your return to service or your career, contact our office for a consultation — we can review your separation record and assess whether an error or injustice supports a correction.
Schedule a ConsultationThis article provides general legal information and does not constitute legal advice. Contact our office for a consultation specific to your situation.